What theory focuses on the behavior leaders should adopt based on varying levels of competencies and commitment from subordinates?

Situational Theory is the most suitable choice because it emphasizes the necessity for leaders to adapt their leadership styles according to the varying levels of competence and commitment exhibited by their subordinates. This theory, developed by Paul Hersey and Kenneth Blanchard, posits that effective leadership requires a combination of directive and supportive behaviors that correspond with the developmental needs of team members.

For instance, when team members are inexperienced or lack confidence, the leader may need to adopt a more directive approach. Conversely, as their skills and confidence grow, a leader can shift to a more supportive and delegative style, fostering autonomy and encouraging team members to take on more responsibility.

In contrast, Contingency Theory addresses how the effectiveness of leadership styles can depend on external variables and situational contexts but does not specifically focus on the competence and commitment of subordinates. Path-Goal Theory is concerned with how leaders can facilitate team members' paths to achieve goals but does not inherently deal with adjusting behaviors based on subordinate commitment levels. Behavioral Theory primarily examines the behaviors that leaders exhibit but does not explicitly connect these behaviors to the skill and commitment levels of subordinates. Thus, Situational Theory stands out for its direct focus on adapting leadership styles based on follower readiness.